Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0358420140570050379
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2014 Volume.57 No. 5 p.379 ~ p.385
Two-port access versus four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
Choi Won-Kyu

Kim Jang-Kew
Yang Jung-Bo
Ko Young-Bok
Nam Sang-Lyun
Lee Ki-Hwan
Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between two-port access and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

Methods: Four hundred and eighty nine patients who had received two-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=175) and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=314) in Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between the bilaterality of the cysts and cyst diameter of less than 6 cm and 6 cm or more.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient¡¯s age, parity, body weight, body mass index and history of previous surgery between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group. Bilaterality of ovarian cysts was more in fourport access laparoscopy group (13.7% vs. 32.5%, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital stay, adhesiolysis, transfusion, and insertion of hemo-vac between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group for size matched compare. However additional analgesics were more in four-port access laparoscopy group for unilateral ovarian cystectomy.

Conclusion: Two-port access laparoscopic surgery was feasible and safe for unilateral and bilateral ovarian cystectomy compare with four-port access laparoscopic surgery.
KEYWORD
Cystectomy, Ovarian cysts, Two-port access laparoscopy
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø